Confucius’s emphasis is on conduct. ‘Fraternal deference’ is his phrase. If a man have “fraternal deference” his character and his opinions will not be a nuisance to his friends and a peril to the community. It is a statesman’s way of thinking. The thought is for the community. Confucius’s constant emphasis is on the value of personality, on the outlines of personality, on the man’s rights to preserve the outlines of his personality, and of his duty not to interfere with the personalities of others.
Ezra Pound. “Provincialism the Enemy, Part II” (New Age, 19 July 1917) in SP 163.
Canto XIII defines the standard of an “illustrious” style with which the Cantos will treat examples of true virtue. Confucius is presented with unadorned, measured language and stately, graceful verse. [...] Kung’s words are an evocation of the “golden world” before nature had fallen. To keep the blossoms of the apricot from falling is to keep nature in a permanent vernal bounty. As in this last figure of Canto XIII, the Cantos will continue to render their civilized men with images of natural increase and divine tranquility.
Ronald Bush. The Genesis of Ezra Pound’s Cantos, 250-51.
CANTO XIII 101
The canto presents the ways Pound situates Confucius in relation to the West along the axes of education, philosophy, religion, arts and morals. He implicitly contrasts Kung’s philosophy, oriented toward society, ethics and politics, to that of his Greek near-contemporaries, Socrates and Plato, whose discussions handled abstract distinctions and “cosmological guesses” (GK 97). Later, Pound would single out Aristotle as Kung’s Western equivalent, since Aristotle had been the only one of the Greeks to think in terms of real politics, not ideal republics: “Aristotle compiled or caused to be compiled descriptions of the constitutions of 158 Greek states” (GK 341).
From a religious point of view, Pound compares Confucianism to Christianity, emphasizing Kung’s orientation towards the life on this earth: Confucius aimed to cultivate in his disciples a sense of community through the performance of rituals and a responsibility for a life of service to the society they live in, not their individual salvation after death. Pound saw the Christian maxim of “love thy neighbour” as an implicit permission to intrude in another person’s private affairs. He invites us to consider the Confucian concept of “brotherly deference,” which respects the private sphere, as a corrective to the Christian value.
Finally, Pound opposes Kung as educator to the pedagogy of his own day, a system inspired by German practice, designed to pursue knowledge for its own sake, not as a preparation for life. Pound felt this knowledge was irrelevant to vital questions and damaging to individuals, since by directing knowledge solely from teacher to students, it subjected the latter to a uniform system, turning them into potential slaves to a tyranny. In “Provincialism, the Enemy II” (1917), Pound aligned Kung with Flaubert and Henry James against unseen, customary enslavement brought about by “hammering the student into a piece of mechanism for the accretion of details, and [...] habituating men to consider themselves as bits of mechanism for one use or another: in contrast to considering first what use they are in being” (Provincialism; P&P II: 233-34).
By contrast, as can be seen from the central scene of the canto taken from The Analects 11.25, Kung’s interaction with students is designed to draw out what they know about themselves and focused on what is most vital to their future. He does not tell them in advance what to think, but only asks a relevant question—the students come up with answers that are neither censored nor aligned to a standard of correctness. It is important to know that Kung does express preferences and judge each student’s answer in The Analects 11.25, but Pound cuts the passages where he does so. Thus, the canto is not a collage of translations designed to illuminate the Confucian text, or recover a “true” Confucius, but is rather what Mary Paterson Cheadle called a “pastiche of passages knit elegantly together,” governed by Pound’s own ideas about the meaning and scope of Confucianism and the lessons it has to offer to Western culture. These emerge in the distinctions between the canto and its source, the minute but highly significant ways in which Pound departs from it to present his position. This is Pound’s original point of view and has little or nothing to do with Confucian studies traditionally perceived.
Pound’s only source for this canto is the French translation of the Four Chinese Classics by G. M. Pauthier entitled Doctrine de Confucius, which contains Le Ta Hio (“La Grande Étude”), Tchong Young (“Invariabilité dans le milieu”), Lun Yu (“Entretiens Philosophiques” [“Philosophical Conversations” or Analects]), and Meng-Tseu (“Mencius”).
The central episode of the canto (the conversation with the disciples) is taken out of Entretiens 11.25 in Pauthier’s translation. Newer editions of The Analects (Lau, Eno, Chin) split 11.2 into two parts, so that 11.25 has become 11.26.
In his “Mr. Villerant’s Morning Outburst,” Pound published a prose translation of the episode in the Little Review in November 1918 ([V], P&P III: 221-223) which is given in the glosses and can be found in the Sources.
ROMANIZATION OF CHINESE NAMES
Pound followed the romanization of names and Chinese terms provided by his sources (Cheadle 7), whereas newer research on both Confucian works and Pound’s translations has followed the pinyin system (Cheadle, Lan, Chin). The Cantos Project will therefore follow the practice of including the Chinese word first in the romanization Pound used, and then in pinyin, in square brackets. For canto XIII, Pound uses the French romanization which he found in his source: Doctrine de Confucius: Les Quatre livres de philosophie morale et politique de la Chine. Traduite par M. G. Pauthier. Paris 1814. Pdf.
The information on Confucius’ disciples is taken from Annping Chin’s “Appendix” and commentaries to her translation of The Analects (Penguin 2014) and Robert Eno’s online translation of The Analects.
Canto XIII in A Draft of XVI Cantos.
Canto XIII in A Draft of XXX Cantos.
Note: The above images are not to scale. The 1925 edition is a folio, whereas the 1930 one is pocket-size.
CALENDAR OF COMPOSITION
Canto XIII was finished in June 1923 and first published in the transatlantic review for January 1924 under the title “One Canto” (P&P IV: 305-306). There is a small difference between the text of the periodical publication and the final version: in the former, the third line was a repetition of the seventh: it was replaced by the current “And into the cedar grove” in A Draft of XVI Cantos.
The textual adventures were not over, however. In A Draft of XVI Cantos (1925), the lines “A day when the historians left blanks in their writings,/“I mean for things they didn’t know,/ “But that time seems to be passing” at the bottom of page 49 were repeated at the top of the next page, probably because the printer had forgotten that he had already set them. Pound did not notice at the time, telling his publisher William Bird on 25 January 1925 that there was “up to date no misprint of any importance.” See Correspondence.
By 1930, in the Hours Press edition of A Draft of XXX Cantos, the repeat had been reduced to two lines (without the middle line: “I mean for the things they didn't know”), in a sort of echo-effect, which suggests that between 1925 and 1930, Pound had seen the repeat and was considering keeping it. Hugh Kenner spotted the passage in the 1930 edition of A Draft of XXX Cantos. See his continuation of the story and extended comment at the bottom of the Calendar.
Correspondence by Ezra Pound: (c) Mary de Rachewiltz and the Estate of Omar S. Pound. Reproduced by permission.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Pearlman, Daniel. The Barb of Time. On the Unity of Ezra Pound's CANTOS. New York: Oxford UP, 1969.
Pound, Ezra. The Letters of Ezra Pound 1907-1941. Ed. D. D. Paige. London: Faber, 1951.
Pound, Ezra. Ezra Pound and Dorothy Shakespear. Their Letters: 1909-1914. Eds. Omar Pound and A Walton Litz. London: Faber & Faber, 1984.
Pound, Ezra. Ezra Pound To His Parents: Letters 1895-1929. Eds. Mary de Rachewiltz, A David Moody and Joanna Moody. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2010.
Pound, Ezra. The Selected Letters of Ezra Pound to John Quinn 1915-1924. Ed. Timothy Materer. Durham NC: Duke UP, 1991.
Pound, Ezra. The Selected Letters of Ezra Pound 1907-1941. Ed. D. D. Paige. New York: New Directions, 1971.
To Dorothy Shakespear, [2 October 1913], London, 10 Church Walk
I would have writ before but I went to Ryde to visit [Allen] Upward. Il pense. It is a rare phenomenon. He has just finished “The Divine Mystery”, digested golden bough with a lot more of his own intelligence stuck into it.
Dined on monday with Sarojini Niadu [sic] and Mrs. Fenollosa, relict of the writer on chinese art, selector of a lot of Freer’s stuff, etc. I seem to be getting orient from all quarters. [...] I’m stocked up with K’ung fu Tsze, and Men Tsze, etc. I suppose they’ll keep me calm for a week or so.
To Dorothy Shakespear, 14 November, 1913, Sussex, Stone Cottage, Coleman’s Hatch
It rains. I have not yet got lost in the wild, tho’ the eagle [Yeats] tried to go the wrong way once, with amazing persistance. I read Kung-fu-tsu & a barbarous Indian thing [Mahabharata] and I read ghosts to the eagle.
To Henry Hope Shakespear, 16 February, 1914 London: 10 Church Walk
Dear Mr. Shakespear
Dorothy says that you have suggested our being married in a church, unless you feel very strongly on this point I should much rather go through the simple and dignified service at the Registry.
I should no more give up my faith in Christ than I should give up my faith in Helios or my respect for the teahings of Confucius, but I think this superficial conformity, an act which would amount, practically, to an outrageous lie at what should be one of [the] most serious moments of a man’s life, interferes.
To John Quinn, 5 July 1922
Mon Cher J.Q.
Still, having got Morand translations off my hands […] And having got five cantos blocked out, I am about ready for the vacation I did not take in Italy. Am feeling damn fit.
To Felix E. Schelling, 8 July 1922
SL 180, L 247
Dear Dr. Schelling:
Perhaps as the poem goes on I shall be able to make various things clearer. Having the crust to attempt a poem in 100 or 120 cantos long after all mankind has been commanded never again to attempt a poem of any length, I have to stagger as I can
The first 11 cantos are preparation of the palette. I have to get down all the colours or elements I want for the poem. Some perhaps too engmatically and abbreviatedly. I hope, heaven help me, to bring them into some sort of design and architecture later.
Note: “The first 11 cantos” would include the present canto XIII, since at the time he wrote the letter, Pound was not envisaging writing four Malatesta cantos but just one.
To Homer Pound, 16 July 1922, 70 bis, rue notre Dame des Champs Paris
Have now a rough draft of 9, 10, 11, 12, 13. IX may swell out into two.
Note: At the time, Pound had written just one Malatesta Canto (number 9) and was considering expanding it to two cantos. The remark in his letter shows that he had drafted the Kung canto (no. 11 which became 13) and the two hell cantos (12, 13 which became 14 and 15).
To IWP, 6 June 1923, 70 bis [Paris]
Am working on Kung canto.
To Homer Pound, 21 June 1923, 70 bis, N.D. de C. [Paris]
Am doing a canto on Kung: don’t know about english translations of him. I have Pauthier’s french translation of the Four Books; and a latin translation of the Odes (an anthology of earlier poetry that K. is said to have collected[)]. The Bowmen of Shu, is supposed to be somewhere in that Anthology.
His idea of beginning in the middle i.e. on oneself is excellent. The exact reverse of Christianchurchism which teaches: thou shalt attend to thy neighbor’s business before thou attendest to thine own.
To John Quinn, 11 August 1923
Cantos are in Criterion for July. More being prepared for Three Mts, edition de luxe.
From Nancy Cunard, Tues [17 June 1930, date on postage stamp]
Beinecke, YCAL 43 Box 11/494
Getting at Bernouard today (if he is in) will make him do a full set of Proofs on the real paper with greek in – he wrote he had not the greek and was ordering the composition of it from the foundery – will have the capitals straightened on pages and the 3 chinese put at Kung. I hope you wrote or will write to Bernouard at once and explicitly on typewriter – there are 3 of us at this production which is a little more complicated than 2 – I mean you have to pass through me – but we shall get it in the end. More when I’ve seen Bernouard.
From Nancy Cunard, Friday [27 June 1930, date on postage stamp]
Beinecke, Box 11/494
straddle-wise, your letters re Cantos all gone through with B [Bernouard, the printer] and proofs en main (I mean, what concerns him, not other observations!) glad the greek is alright. Once more I impressed urgency of Chinese and K’s to their urgent places; he understood the pages à soigner.
From Hugh Kenner’s “Introduction” to Barbara Eastman. Ezra Pound's Cantos: The Story of the Text 1948-1975. Orono: NPF, 1979. xiii-xiv.
In general, if a printed text is somehow available it makes a good copytext for a subsequent printer, who however is apt to reproduce its errors with painful fidelity. In 1930 the Hours Press, Paris, produced just 212 copies of A Draft of XXX Cantos. Among its features was a curious repeat in Canto XIII:
And even I can remember
A day when the historians left blanks in their writings,
I mean for things they didn’t know,
But that time seems to be passing.”
A day when the historians left blanks in their writings,
But that time seems to be passing.”
The repeated terminal quotation mark tells us that this is the printer’s doing; he somehow set two lines twice. In 1933 Farrar and Rinehart (N.Y.) issued A Draft of XXX Cantos with these lines given exactly as above; evidently their printer’s copytext was a copy of the Hours Press book. In the same year Faber & Faber issued A Draft of XXX Cantos without the repeat; their copytext was either an Hours Press very carefully corrected (since other Hours Press errors were also excised) or–more likely–a fresh typescript. Faber’s jacket spoke of “Mr. Pound’s latest corrections.” Eventually New Directions acquired Farrar & Rinehart’s plates and the version with the repeat stood until their 1971 printing, when on someone’s instructions it was deleted, thus bringing the text into conformity with Faber’s.
One would think the repeat should therefore be excised forever? Yet anomalies persist. The most carefully supervised of all editions of Cantos I-XXX, the Lerici of 1961 with Italian translation en face by Mary de Rachewiltz and numerous corrections authorized by her father the author, has on page 132 an English text à la Faber, with no repeat, but on the facing page,
“E io ricordo che una volta
“Gli storiografi lasciavan lacune, intendo
“Per quel che ignoravano, ma
“Quel tempo pare passi.
“Gli storiografi lasciavan lacune...
We deduce from this that whereas the Italian translation was based on the New Directions text, the English of the Lerici edition followed the Faber! The Lerici printer, that means, was handed a Faber book for a copytext, Mary de Rachewiltz's heavily annotated New Directions being too precious to part with. Repeat or no repeat? The question still seems open. But if the author’s word counts for something, here is the author’s word (1957). I planned to include canto XIII in an anthology called The Art of Poetry, [xiv] and wrote Pound to ask if he wanted the repeat deleted. He replied: “Repeat in XIII sanctioned by time and the author, or rather first by the author, who never objects to the typesetter making improvements.”
If that is so, the current standard text, in being repeatless, is wrong. But Pound seems never to have requested an emendation of Faber, and the repeat vanished from the New Directions text in his lifetime without his protest. He thought different things on different days? Or more likely he scanned one version without memory of the other.
Deliberated final intention? There would seem to be no such thing.
And supposing we retain the repeat in an ideal edition, should we delete the first closing quotation mark which signals its origin in a printer’s error? I did so in my anthology, and was probably right not to strew that additional thorn before the tender feet of anthology readers. In a proper edition of the Cantos I’m not sure that I would. Pound never covered his tracks: he let “Rihaku” stand in Cathay for a poet whose Chinese name he knew was “Li Po,” in testimony to the chain of transmission, Mori and Ariga via Fenollosa. He left Chinese names in the orthography of his source of the moment, Pauthier, Legge, De Mailla, Couvreur, permitting the Cantos to reflect not some ideal transliteration but changing western interactions with China and the poet’s successive encounters with these. (And recently, the tidying-up of the text of the big book has exhibited a tendency to regularize these names, which I think is simply wrong.) So one may judge that it is in character for him to have left a sign of the occasion when a typesetter inadvertently made an improvement, and the author’s inaction sanctioned it.
Pound’s Confucian sources, articles,
translations and original poems
1913 - Pound writes to Dorothy in October that he is reading Confucius and Mencius, probably in Pauthier's translation. See Calendar.
1914 – “The Words of Ming Mao ‘Least among the Disciples of Kung Fu-Tze.’” [Egoist I. 24 (15 December 1914): 456.] P&P I: 320.
1915 – Three Cantos I [Poetry June 1917]. Personae 229-234.
1917 – “Provincialism the Enemy II.” [New Age 21.12 (19 July 1917): 268-69]. SP 193-96; P&P II: 233-34.
1918 – “Mr. Villerant's Morning Outburst.” [3rd letter]. Little Review V.7 (November 1918): 7-12. P&P III: 221-223. Pavannes & Divagations 72-73. Pdf.
Around 1920 Pound acquires Alexandre de Lacharme’s Latin translation of the Odes [Shi Jing] called: Confucii Chi-King Sive Liber Carminum. Stuttgart: Julius Mohl, 1830 (Cheadle 156, 299).
1923 – Canto XIII. [“One canto.” Transatlantic review I.1. 1924]. A Draft of XVI Cantos. Paris: Three Mountains Press, 1925.
1927 - “Prolegomena.” [Exile 2 (Autumn 1927): 35] SP 216; P&P IV: 385.
Circumstantial evidence signalled by Porteous, Fang, and Cheadle suggests Pound had acquired an anonymous version of James Legge’s English translation of the Four Books in bilingual edition, which he used in his translation of The Great Learning (Cheadle 23, 280: n.51.)
1928 – Confucius. Ta Hio. The Great Learning. Seattle: U of Washington Bookstore. Reprinted in 1936 and 1939.
1936 – Ta Hio. The Great Learning. London: Stanley Nott. [Ideogrammic series]
1937 - Pound writes to his friend Katue Kitasono to send him a copy of the Chinese text of the Shi Jing which he hopes to read together with Alexandre de Lacharme's Latin translation as a crib. Kitasono sends him a four volume edition (text and commentary) that arrive in Rapallo by October 1937. Pound found it difficult to establish the correspondences between the Chinese text and the Latin crib (Cheadle 156).
1937 – Confucius. Digest of the Analects. Abridged and translated by Ezra Pound. Milan: All’ Insegna del Pesce d’Oro.
1937 – “Immediate Need of Confucius” [Aryan Path, August 1937; Impact. Regnery 1960]. SP 75-80.
1937 – “Mang- Tze (The Ethics of Mencius).” [The Criterion, July 1938; Impact. Regnery 1960]. SP 81-97.
1938 – Guide to Kulchur. London: Peter Owen, 1978.
1939 – Reprint of Ta Hio. The Great Learning. Norfolk Conn.: New Directions.
1940 – Cantos LII-LXI. [The China Cantos]. London: Faber and Faber, 1940; New Directions, 1940.
1942 – [with Alberto Luchini]. Confucio. Ta S’eu, Dai Gaku, Studio Integrale. Rapallo: Scuola Tipografica Orfanotrofio Emiliani.
1944 – Testamento di Confucio. Venice: Casa Editrice delle Edizioni Popolari.
1944 – Chung Iung. L’Asse che non vacilla. Venice: Casa Editrice delle Edizioni Popolari.
1945 – The Pisan Cantos. New York: New Directions, 1948.
“In 1944-45, a modern translation of the Shi Jing by the Swedish sinologist Bernhard Karlgren, the sinologist most responsible for reforming the West's understanding of the composition of written Chinese, was published as ‘The Book of Odes’ in the Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities. At St. Elizabeths, Pound closely read and studied these translations, Karlgren’s glosses, and the Chinese text that accompanied them, making his own glosses in the margins. Sometime between 1937, when it is apparent from his letters to Katue that Pound did not own a Chinese text of the Confucian odes, and 1950, he also acquired James Legge’s bilingual edition of the Shi Jing, for it is clear from his translations that Pound used both Karlgren’s translation and Legge’s translations as guides for his own” (Cheadle 156-57).
1947 – The Unwobbling Pivot and The Great Digest. Pharos 1.4 (winter 1947) [revised translation based on James Legge]
1947 – “Mencius or the Economist.” New Iconograph 1.1 (fall 1947): 19-21.
1950 – Confucius. The Analects. Books I-X. Hudson Review 3.1 (spring 1950): 9-53; Books XI-XX. 3.2 (summer 1950): 237-88.
1951 - The Analects. [Text reproduced from the Hudson Review. Cover design by Michael Lekakis.] New York: Sq $ Series.
1951 – Confucius. The Great Digest, The Unwobbling Pivot, The Analects. Translation and commentary by Ezra Pound. New York: New Directions. [Stone Classics edition]
1951 – Ernest Fenollosa. The Chinese Written Character as a Medium for Poetry and Confucius, The Unwobbling Pivot and The Great Digest. New York: Square Dollar Series.
1954 – The Confucian Odes. The Classic Anthology Defined by Confucius. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP.
1955 – Confucius. Studio Integrale and L’asse Che Non Vacilla. Milan: All’Insegna Del Pesce D’Oro.
1956 - Confucian Analects. Translated and introduced by Ezra Pound. London: Peter Owen.
1964 – [with Marcella Spann]. Confucius to Cummings. An Anthology of Poetry. New York: New Directions.
Cheadle, Mary Paterson. Ezra Pound’s Confucian Translations. Ann Arbor: Michigan UP, 1997.
Lan, Fen. Ezra Pound and Confucianism: Remaking Humanism in the Face of Modernity. Toronto: Toronto UP, 2005.
XIII – BIBLIOGRAPHY
ARTICLES IN JOURNALS AND COLLECTIONS
- Bacigalupo, Massimo. “Starting from China: A New Translation of The Cantos.” Europe Facing Inter-Asian Cultural, Literary, Historical and Political Situations. Ed. Lina Unali and Elisabetta Marino. Rome: UniversItalia, 2014. 17-32.
- Howard, Alexander. “Canto 13.” Readings in The Cantos. Ed. Richard Parker. Clemson: Clemson UP, 2018. 135-44.
- Qian, Zhaoming “Ezra Pound and His First Chinese Contact for and Against Confucianism.” Paideuma: Studies in American and British Modernist Poetry 35.1-2 (2006): 157-77.
- Rosenthal, Marilyn. “The Impact of Confucius on Ezra Pound’s ‘Canto XIII’: An Explication De Texte.” Chinese Culture: A Quarterly Review 18 (1977): 41-8.
- Yueh-nung, Tseng. “On Ezra Pound’s Canto XIII.” Chinese Culture: A Quarterly Review 2 (1959): 1-3.
BOOK CHAPTERS AND SECTIONS
- Bacigalupo, Massimo. “Annotazioni XIII.” Ezra Pound XXX Cantos. Parma: Ugo Guanda, 2012. 344.
- Brooker, Peter. “Canto XIII.” A Student’s Guide to the Selected Poems of Ezra Pound. London: Faber 1979. 257-59.
- Bush, Ron. The Genesis of Ezra Pound’s Cantos. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1976. 250-51.
- Cheadle, Mary Paterson. Ezra Pound’s Confucian Translations. Ann Arbor: Michigan UP, 1997. 19-22.
- Cookson, William. “Confucius.” A Guide to the Cantos of Ezra Pound. London: Anvil, 2001. 26.
- De Rachewiltz, Mary and Maria Ardizzone. “Commento: XIII.” Ezra Pound I Cantos. A cura di Mary de Rachewiltz. [Bilingual English-Italian edition]. Milano: Mondadori, 1985. 1511.
- Froula, Christine. A Guide to Ezra Pound’s Selected Poems. New York: New Directions, 1983. 148-50.
- Furia, Philip. Pound’s Cantos Declassified. University Park and London: The Pennsylvania State UP, 1984. 32-33.
- Gelpi, Albert. [Canto XIII]. A Coherent Splendour. The American Poetic Renaissance 1910-1950. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1987. 201-204.
- Ickstadt, Heinz und Eva Hesse. “Anmerkungen und Kommentar: Canto XIII.” Ezra Pound. Die Cantos. Tr. by Eva Hesse and Manfred Pfister. Eds. Manfred Pfister and Heinz Ickstadt. Zurich: Arche Literatur Verlag, 2013. 1218-19.
- Kearns, George. Ezra Pound. The Cantos. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1989. 58-59.
- Kearns, George. Guide to Ezra Pound’s Selected Cantos. New Brunswick: Rutgers, UP, 1980. 55-61.
- Kenner, Hugh. The Pound Era. Berkeley: California UP, 1971. 445-447.
- Knapp, James F. Ezra Pound. Boston: Twayne, 1979. 128-29.
- Lan, Fen. Ezra Pound and Confucianism: Remaking Humanism in the Face of Modernity. Toronto: Toronto UP, 2005. 93-109.
- Qian, Zhaoming. Ezra Pound’s Chinese Friends. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008.
- Qian, Zhaoming. The Modernist Response to Chinese Art: Pound, Moore, Stevens. Charlottesville: Virginia UP, 2003. 59-61.
- Palandri Jung, Angela. “Homage to a Confucian Poet.” Paideuma 3.3 (Winter 1974): 301-311.
- Sieburth, Richard. “Notes. Canto XIII.” Ezra Pound. New Selected Poems and Translations. Ed. Richard Sieburth. New York: New Directions, 2010. 311-12.
- Su, Kent. “Confucius at the ‘Apricot Altar’ in Ezra Pound’s Canto XIII.” Notes and Queries, 18 January 2020. Abstract.
- Terrell, Carroll F. “Canto XIII.” A Companion to The Cantos of Ezra Pound. Berkeley: California UP, 1993. 60-64.
- Wilhelm, J. J. Ezra Pound in London and Paris 1908-1925. University Park and London: The Pennsylvania State UP, 1990. 351.
- Yao, Steven G. Translation and the Language of Modernism: Gender, Politics, Language. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002. 159-61.
- “Canto XIII.”A Canto a Day. Blog, 2 February 2009. Accessed 4 August 2018. Free online.
- Guidi, Paolo. “Canto XIII.” The Cantos of Ezra Pound. Etching series. 23 September 2012. Accessed 4 August 2018. Free online.
- Sellar, Gordon. “Blogging Pound's The Cantos: Canto XII-XIII.” gordsellar.com, 24 April 2012. Web. Free online.